In the spirit of inquiry, I'm waiting for the other half of this story. These articles seem sensationalist. So what's the catch? Does it have to do with stud

In the spirit of inquiry, I'm waiting for the other half of this story. These articles seem sensationalist. So what's the catch? Does it have to do with studies being pre-clinical and more likely to be wrong? Or is it that they're being held to a different level of scrutiny? Or the evidence shows correlation, but not statistical significance? Or are things really this bad?