Contrary to some other users here I don't see Greenwald's habitual hostility as a negative thing, at least in his case. What he writes about, writes against, ar

Contrary to some other users here I don't see Greenwald's habitual hostility as a negative thing, at least in his case. What he writes about, writes against, are systems of oppression and death -- if you agree with his positions in the slightest you will agree with that. The alternative of "maybe killing American citizens with drone strikes without due process is a bad thing, I think it might be, don't you?" would not have gotten him where he was (in terms of readership, visibility, reputation, w/e etc) before Snowden, and probably would not have appealed to Snowden.