3 ms·
I run Ubuntu on my PC, it's an i7 8 core machine with nVidia GTX 660 and the latest tested Restricted driver from the repository. That animation drove my CPU ag
by jebblue 13y ago
I run Ubuntu on my PC, it's an i7 8 core machine with nVidia GTX 660 and the latest tested Restricted driver from the repository. That animation drove my CPU aggregate by top to 90% usage. I clicked the Edit button and while the code was showing the CPU activity dropped back to minimal.
- xmus 13y agoi run Ubuntu as well (13.10, Dual Core 1.1GHz - though i set the clock to 800MHz, Intel HD) and nothing unusual happened when the animations were being displayed - if a shitty Intel chip can run the animations - i can't help and wonder you tweaked something you weren't suppose to?
- jebblue 13y agoWhat was your CPU time? I run GKrellM so I notice when something starts hogging the CPU, the animation did play just fine, should it take 90% CPU time to run an animation on modern hardware? That was the point of my post. That CPU usage costs me money.
- xmus 13y agoi've installed GKrellM and i got around 23% of cpu load when the animations were displayed - clock set to 800MHz [set via indicator-cpufreq] - mind you during the "test" lost of things were running to if the CSS3 animations got up to 90% on YOUR hardware - where does that leave the rest of us [i.e. shitty intel HD card owners]? :)
- zhte415 13y agoi3 on Mint, Intel graphics. Took around 20% of one core (derived by clicking and unclicking Edit / Run).