3 ms·
And whats the alternative for you ?
by tbarbugli 13y ago
And whats the alternative for you ?
- schrodinger 13y agoOrder by the thing you actually care about, like a time stamp. And add an index on that column to make it efficient. You still need to analyze the query to determine if it's worth adding a covering index, or letting the DBMS perform a key lookup, but that's probably beyond the scope of a comment here. I guess it's not keyset based paging that is to be avoided, but paging based on a surrogate key which is a meaningless value. If your key had a meaningful value, it's a valid way of writing the query.