Have you? Semi-serious question, genuinely not intended to offend. It's perfectly reasonable to have the opinion that wpietri advanced, and it's perfectly rea

Have you? Semi-serious question, genuinely not intended to offend. It's perfectly reasonable to have the opinion that wpietri advanced, and it's perfectly reasonable to raise it in this context. One could believe that for aesthetic reasons, or for political reasons, or other reasons, or a combination thereof. And I suggest that it's a higher caliber of comment than the mean HN comment, given that it suggests a source for deeper study of the commenter's opinion. On the other hand, attempting to (tentatively) diagnose psychiatric disorders based on a single sentence on HN is completely implausible, totally insensitive (to actually ASD sufferers, I mean.. I'm sure wpietri can take it), totally oblivious to social context, and suggests that you might have a "stereotyped pattern of behaviour or interest". Unless, of course, you have professional qualifications for such a (tentative) diagnosis, in which case I take it back.