3 ms·
> From a legal standpoint, they were untouchable with the whole "parallel construction" thing. Where's the test case for parallel construction? Without some ca
by bhickey 13y ago
> From a legal standpoint, they were untouchable with the whole "parallel construction" thing.
Where's the test case for parallel construction? Without some case law, I could easily imagine a federal court taking a dim view of this legal theory.
- Tuna-Fish 13y agoThe entire point of parallel construction is that no court will ever know it was used in a case, so there is never a case in which it can be challenged, making it and the surveillance used untouchable by courts.