3 ms·
Sure, and if the claim is actually controversial (someone says "I don't think that's true) we need higher standards. But I see stuff reverted without anyone wil
by hyperpape 13y ago
Sure, and if the claim is actually controversial (someone says "I don't think that's true) we need higher standards. But I see stuff reverted without anyone willing to say "that sounds wrong".
- gnaritas 13y agoI think it should be, no sources, no argument required to cut it. What can be asserted without evidence can be removed with discussion.