3 ms·

I'm sure Shaun has thought about this but I think it would have worked really well as hosted solution with free and paid accounts. I'd be more than happy to pay

I'm sure Shaun has thought about this but I think it would have worked really well as hosted solution with free and paid accounts. I'd be more than happy to pay $10 a month for Fever as I've been looking for a way to sort out RSS feeds in this way.

pstinnett 17y ago
I feel kind of torn on this issue (and Fever in general). I was hoping this was going to be a hosted solution ($30/year) but the idea of hosting it myself also seems kind of cool. I'm just worried that my MediaTemple grid account won't be snappy enough. Does anyone have any thoughts on that? I know people had problems with Mint slowing their servers down. I'll still probably try this out though!
adamhowell 17y ago
I was thinking long and hard about doing something similar to Fever this year (with the main feature being the granular updates I've mentioned below) but w/ Reader being absolutely free I really didn't think $5/month or $30/year had much of a chance. Plus, hosting all those feeds w/ a one-man shop would've really been a bear. I think Shaun's $30/one-time cost + you deal with your own feeds is a really smart approach. Wish I'd have thought of it.
wmeredith 17y ago
I agree. It's a surreal combination of front-end polish (I'm sort of amazed) and difficult multi-step DIY installation(wtf?). I'd buy a desktop version or subscribe to a hosted version right now, but I don't want to deal with all that crap if I'm paying someone for an application. (If it's open source like Wordpress or something, fine. I'll deal with settign up my own cron jobs and creating databases.) I hope it does well though, so that it will be worth his time to develop a desktop platform or something I can just purchase from the Apple App Store. (Hopefully both.)
cedsav 17y ago
Shaun marketed Mint that way (same price point if I remember). It probably worked well enough for him to continue with that model. I'm sure he also enjoys sleeping without having to worry about server downtime :-)

pstinnett 17y ago

I feel kind of torn on this issue (and Fever in general). I was hoping this was going to be a hosted solution ($30/year) but the idea of hosting it myself also seems kind of cool. I'm just worried that my MediaTemple grid account won't be snappy enough. Does anyone have any thoughts on that? I know people had problems with Mint slowing their servers down. I'll still probably try this out though!

adamhowell 17y ago

I was thinking long and hard about doing something similar to Fever this year (with the main feature being the granular updates I've mentioned below) but w/ Reader being absolutely free I really didn't think $5/month or $30/year had much of a chance. Plus, hosting all those feeds w/ a one-man shop would've really been a bear. I think Shaun's $30/one-time cost + you deal with your own feeds is a really smart approach. Wish I'd have thought of it.

wmeredith 17y ago

I agree. It's a surreal combination of front-end polish (I'm sort of amazed) and difficult multi-step DIY installation(wtf?). I'd buy a desktop version or subscribe to a hosted version right now, but I don't want to deal with all that crap if I'm paying someone for an application. (If it's open source like Wordpress or something, fine. I'll deal with settign up my own cron jobs and creating databases.) I hope it does well though, so that it will be worth his time to develop a desktop platform or something I can just purchase from the Apple App Store. (Hopefully both.)

cedsav 17y ago

Shaun marketed Mint that way (same price point if I remember). It probably worked well enough for him to continue with that model. I'm sure he also enjoys sleeping without having to worry about server downtime :-)