3 ms·
I don't want to be rude but I don't think you know very much about self-driving cars. They are much more advanced than you think. Also you talk Thailand, I gues
by dinkumthinkum 13y ago
I don't want to be rude but I don't think you know very much about self-driving cars. They are much more advanced than you think. Also you talk Thailand, I guess you mean the free-for-all situation ... Well, humans would adjust their behavior to the reality of self driving cars but in reality, these cars are much better at these situations than you think. You greatly underestimate the state of the technology even in its current form. We're talking the possibility of reducing 95% of accidents and fatalities. The sensor perception and trajectory calculation is much better than what humans can do. Driving is not about solving natural language riddles. You don't need "strong AI."
- mojuba 13y agoI don't blindly believe in what Google is saying about self-driving cars. I do blindly believe in what this artcile is saying though: http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverless-cars-are-further-away-than-you-think/ http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverl... (a recent HN link, by the way)
- dinkumthinkum 13y agoOh I don't blindly believe what Google says either. Google is hardly the only one in this game. There many analysts in this field thinking the same thing. This is already going to affect toll roads being built in the next few years regarding risk propositions. The risk proposition will change. Go and talk to people at the Transpirtation Research Board next year. This is not just Google starry eyes but very serious.