We are now really comparing physical property rights with copyright? I have property rights to this copy of a banana, so it follows someone should have a right

We are now really comparing physical property rights with copyright? I have property rights to this copy of a banana, so it follows someone should have a right to all bananas? Isn't the scope and intrusion worth considering? (I ignored the part on economic theory because first of all 1) you're likely wrong on your assumptions 2) none of it is applicable to lawmakers as they exist today, they are not science-, but ideology-driven)