3 ms·
40km != 87 miles, as you note. This appears to be a transcription error in the article from an earlier 140km, and it should read 25 miles per year. (at least,
by ronaldx 13y ago
40km != 87 miles, as you note.
This appears to be a transcription error in the article from an earlier 140km, and it should read 25 miles per year.
(at least, if the graph is correct)
- mturmon 13y agoI think they were using the kg to pounds factor!