3 ms·

Thanks for the link. I skimmed through the article and found this bit of unit conversion amusing: "... compared with 40 km (87 miles) per year in the United St

Thanks for the link. I skimmed through the article and found this bit of unit conversion amusing: "... compared with 40 km (87 miles) per year in the United States ..." That's a shockingly low number of miles ridden per year. I will no longer think of myself as an underachiever on Strava :)

ronaldx 13y ago
40km != 87 miles, as you note. This appears to be a transcription error in the article from an earlier 140km, and it should read 25 miles per year. (at least, if the graph is correct)
- mturmon 13y ago
  I think they were using the kg to pounds factor!