3 ms·
I think you sort of missed what I'm saying - we're talking about a MBP that has better battery life already than your 2010 MBA. The 2013 MBP has a 9-hour batter
by ScottWhigham 13y ago
I think you sort of missed what I'm saying - we're talking about a MBP that has better battery life already than your 2010 MBA. The 2013 MBP has a 9-hour battery life compared to the 12-hour 2013 MBA battery life. That's a "difference" but is that extra three hours of battery life worth trading for a 60% faster processor? I don't see that as a good trade off.
- rayiner 13y agoSorry, I read out the word "the". I thought you were saying "battery life is good enough." I would rather have the 3 extra hours than the 60% faster processor (though I would rather have the retina display than the 3 extra hours). My aging MBA compiles LLVM, the biggest thing I ever build these days, in 10-12 minutes. Do I care if that number is 7-8 instead? Not really. On the other hand, three extra hours can mean leaving the charger at home.