I'm nobody compared to the quoted people, but I use AI in computer vision, and while I love using Bayesian math for parts of it, I've found no substitute for pr

I'm nobody compared to the quoted people, but I use AI in computer vision, and while I love using Bayesian math for parts of it, I've found no substitute for pragmatically programming in knowledge about the system. Which is different from what the article is talking about; I'm aware. I'm just trying to make a system that works, not understand how the brain works. But I view those as somewhat orthogonal problems ; my computer is structured differently than a human brain, perhaps my algorithms should be different as well. Certainly I see no reason to view the brain as having the best algorithm - perhaps a very non-human brain type of algorithm would be superior. Evolution worked with what it had, and it is unlikely that the result is optimal.