4 ms·
Perhaps one of the reasons emotional language keeps appearing in this thread is that moral judgments can be viewed as nothing more than the expression of emotio
by edavison1 13y ago
Perhaps one of the reasons emotional language keeps appearing in this thread is that moral judgments can be viewed as nothing more than the expression of emotional attitudes, as opposed to propositions with any particular truth value. That kind of language may be essential to any productive conversation about ethics.
- chill1 13y ago> ".. moral judgments can be viewed as nothing more than the expression of emotional attitudes.." I sense that you hold an underlying assumption that morality cannot be attained through logic and reasoning.
- edavison1 13y agoEh, I don't know but the 'open question' argument has always made sense to me: 'For any non-moral description of an action or object it seemed that competent speakers could without confusion doubt that the action or object was appropriately characterized using a moral term such as ‘good’ or ‘right’. The question of whether the action or object so described was good or right was always open, even to competent speakers.' http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/