4 ms·
To be fair, they specifically mention that they use OAuth for Gmail/GApps. It seems like they're aware of this but it's hardly their responsibility to avoid bu
by tekacs 13y ago
To be fair, they specifically mention that they use OAuth for Gmail/GApps.
It seems like they're aware of this but it's hardly their responsibility to avoid building a hack such as this just because Google are the only provider to allow IMAP access with OAuth. If more e-mail providers would allow such authentication, I'm sure LinkedIn would be happy to extend the support.
- rhizome 13y agoIt seems like they're aware of this but it's hardly their responsibility to avoid building a hack such as this... Is that so? "Fsck the world, we got a business to run?"
- tekacs 13y agoHow about "the world isn't perfect and whilst it would be great to live up to our every ideal, our primary responsibility is running a business and providing a great experience for our users who, ultimately, in the vast majority regularly engage in such egregious violations of sensible security protocol that most-anything we do is unlikely to affect them and in cases where it would, said users are usually sufficiently literate to wish to avoid this anyway".