3 ms·
I did read that. And that is why I added the "in jest" part, followed by my serious comment. However, rereading my comment, I should have said "in jest" instead
by rallison 13y ago
I did read that. And that is why I added the "in jest" part, followed by my serious comment. However, rereading my comment, I should have said "in jest" instead of "mostly in jest."
- dougmccune 13y agoah, I can re-read and see how that is meant as a joke specifically targeting the text I quoted. Gotta love the internets, where no one can hear your intonation and subtleties
- rallison 13y agoIndeed. On the plus side, with this comment chain, I doubt that anybody else will miss the subtlety.