3 ms·
Isn't this example wrong: (I'm not much familiar with libuv, but reading from the comments it might be): http://nikhilm.github.io/uvbook/filesystem.html http:/
by malkia 13y ago
Isn't this example wrong: (I'm not much familiar with libuv, but reading from the comments it might be):
http://nikhilm.github.io/uvbook/filesystem.html http://nikhilm.github.io/uvbook/filesystem.html
void on_read(uv_fs_t *req) {
uv_fs_req_cleanup(req); // <-- bug? freeing here, later using req ptr?
if (req->result < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Read error: %s\n", uv_strerror(uv_last_error(uv_default_loop())));
}
else if (req->result == 0) {
uv_fs_t close_req;
// synchronous
uv_fs_close(uv_default_loop(), &close_req, open_req.result, NULL);
}
else {
uv_fs_write(uv_default_loop(), &write_req, 1, buffer, req->result, -1, on_write);
}
}
- nsm 13y agoIt's correct. uv_fs_req_cleanup() deletes some private data associated with the uv_fs_t. `result` is part of the public interface and is unaffected.