3 ms·

I tend to agree that no sane person with minimal technical knowledge would balk at this. I already know that Yahoo! sells the email addresses of the people I e

by cpg 13y ago

I tend to agree that no sane person with minimal technical knowledge would balk at this. I already know that Yahoo! sells the email addresses of the people I exchange even one email with to LinkedIn and I am repulsed by this. LI then turns around and offers them as connections. I should note I am always logged out from LI to prevent even more evil from them. LI is just evil and should be eradicated.

berberous 13y ago
I highly doubt Yahoo is selling your e-mail contacts to LI. Do you have any proof or citations? I suspect either you authorized LI in the past (and forgot it's still authorized), or your contacts have authorized LI so it's pulling in their e-mails with you, not yours.
shortsleeves 13y ago
I think you might be forgetting that by e-mailing said person, you become part of their contacts too. Should that person decide to import or sync their contacts in linkedin, a relationship between you and that person is established on their server. ie: it's an _undirected_ edge between you and your contact, which they seem to use to display stuff back to you.
- tedunangst 13y ago
  no, no, no. Reddit's Razor: if a corporation could be doing something evil, they are doing that something.
  - brymaster 13y ago
    These "social" big data companies have a history of doing evil (or sometimes, stepping right up to that line) and $LKND certainly isn't in business to be altruistic. Their iphone app used to slurp up your data without authorization: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/your-iphone-calendar-isnt-privateat-least-if-you-use-the-linkedin-app/ http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/your-iphone-calendar-is... Furthermore: LinkedIn: The Creepiest Social Network https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5680680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5680680 LinkedIn opts 100 million users into sharing information with ads https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2872030 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2872030 LinkedIn is Evil https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=220138 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=220138
    - tedunangst 13y ago
      I thank you for providing examples that prove my point. :) That's mostly speculation along the lines of "evil could have been done, therefore evil must have been done".

by cpg 13y ago

berberous 13y ago

I highly doubt Yahoo is selling your e-mail contacts to LI. Do you have any proof or citations? I suspect either you authorized LI in the past (and forgot it's still authorized), or your contacts have authorized LI so it's pulling in their e-mails with you, not yours.

shortsleeves 13y ago

I think you might be forgetting that by e-mailing said person, you become part of their contacts too. Should that person decide to import or sync their contacts in linkedin, a relationship between you and that person is established on their server. ie: it's an _undirected_ edge between you and your contact, which they seem to use to display stuff back to you.

tedunangst 13y ago
no, no, no. Reddit's Razor: if a corporation could be doing something evil, they are doing that something.
- brymaster 13y ago
  These "social" big data companies have a history of doing evil (or sometimes, stepping right up to that line) and $LKND certainly isn't in business to be altruistic. Their iphone app used to slurp up your data without authorization: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/your-iphone-calendar-isnt-privateat-least-if-you-use-the-linkedin-app/ http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/your-iphone-calendar-is... Furthermore: LinkedIn: The Creepiest Social Network https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5680680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5680680 LinkedIn opts 100 million users into sharing information with ads https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2872030 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2872030 LinkedIn is Evil https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=220138 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=220138
  - tedunangst 13y ago
    I thank you for providing examples that prove my point. :) That's mostly speculation along the lines of "evil could have been done, therefore evil must have been done".