3 ms·
to be honest, it looks like he assumed the table was sorted by acquisition rate... would have made a lot more sense that way, instead of sorting it by # of star
by drusenko 17y ago
to be honest, it looks like he assumed the table was sorted by acquisition rate... would have made a lot more sense that way, instead of sorting it by # of startups
- axod 17y agoYeah you'd have to be a rocket scientist to be able to look down the list and find the biggest numbers... Off topic, but very funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I