3 ms·
Did this change in C++11 or does this wording mean the same thing? It's not clear to me that the implicitly public a is of a different access control than the e
by ben0x539 13y ago
Did this change in C++11 or does this wording mean the same thing? It's not clear to me that the implicitly public a is of a different access control than the explicitly public b according to the following wording:
> Nonstatic data members of a (non-union) class with the same access control (Clause 11) are allocated so that later members have higher addresses within a class object. The order of allocation of non-static data members with different access control is unspecified (11).