4 ms·
You clearly missed the point. The point is: >>Having them set off in a secure airport area doesn't illustrate any new vulnerabilities. We already know that trus
by 3327 13y ago
You clearly missed the point. The point is:
>>Having them set off in a secure airport area doesn't illustrate any new vulnerabilities. We already know that trusted people can subvert security systems. So what?
point is that an inside man setting off a dry ice bomb does not highlight 'a breach of security'. His rhetoric on the harmlessness of a dry ice bomb seems to be aimed at the fact that a dryice bomb is harmless, set off by an insider is the sole reason to come to the conclusion that LAX lacks security.
- jusben1369 13y agoI think your point makes sense. I also think you made it better than the author. He does appear to equate this person's actions with his own as a college student or younger in the backyard. I suspect the mindset and motivations though between the two are vastly different. So personalizing it in this way just makes for a confusing side story.