I don't think your comment and my comment fundamentally agree. There are two issues at play here: 1) Did he copy propriety GS code that he had no involvement w

I don't think your comment and my comment fundamentally agree. There are two issues at play here: 1) Did he copy propriety GS code that he had no involvement with. A lot of people seem in this thread seem to think he didn't, but as far as I can tell from the indictment it's pretty explicit that he did and I don't think that it's disputed by either side. 2) Was his intention out of malice (intention to steal trade secrets), stupidity or something in between. The first is the point I'm making without commenting on the second.