2 ms·
1500 you wouldnt have to pay if the Mac Pro had some form of support for internal drives. Its 1500 you have to spend because Apple sacrificed expandability for
by kayoone 13y ago
1500 you wouldnt have to pay if the Mac Pro had some form of support for internal drives. Its 1500 you have to spend because Apple sacrificed expandability for design, size and light weight in a workstation computer.. It really only makes any sense if you need to lug the thing around alot (in which case i would think a top of the line macbook pro would be the better choice), or you just dont care about the money.
- e40 13y agoThis is true. I wonder what the profit margin is on the new Mac Pro vs the old? Was there a $2999 version of the old? If there was, I wonder if they're basically pocketing the difference in cost, because they've conditioned us to spend $2999 on them. (I'm assuming the new Mac Pro is cheaper to produce than the old, but I could be wrong.)