3 ms·
I don't know man, while those possible sources of complexity and complications may be the case, to me they're still inexcusable. Many companies each year manage
by adam419 13y ago
I don't know man, while those possible sources of complexity and complications may be the case, to me they're still inexcusable. Many companies each year manage to successfully implement and release systems of ungodly complexity compared to whatever had to be dealt with to make some website like this.
All those sources of inefficiency are, to me, consequential of the fact that the people doing this work don't have proper incentives. $90M for a failed website that has to be redone? Well it's just tax dollars, let's suck in some more.
If any private company were to perform like this, they would be obliterated and their work would be done by people who are competent.
- swalkergibson 13y agoIf you will recall, Twitter in its early days was essentially unusable due to high load. That was a private company that ultimately found its way. However, that is really here nor there. I am always hesitant to make an armchair judgement about the execution of a development project without all of the facts because there are so many places where things can go pear-shaped. That is basically my point.