4 ms·
(I'm not a lawyer, but) I doubt they are in the clear. Sounds like they injected a public survey in a communication channel previously reserved for private int
by clarkevans 13y ago
(I'm not a lawyer, but) I doubt they are in the clear. Sounds like they injected a public survey in a communication channel previously reserved for private interaction with their doctor. Perhaps the patient (state privacy law), doctor (business associates agreement), and the government (via HIPPA) have standing.
Under 42 USC § 1320d-5, penalties for wilful neglect are $10k per occurrence, up to 1.5M. There are also criminal penalties for up-to ten years for those who "knowingly" disclose individually identifiable health information for commercial advantage.
- jtheory 13y agoAh, it's not willful, though. They apparently assumed that every single patient would read and understand the tiny, italicized grey print warning to not include personal information.
- thetylerhayes 13y agosidebar: > HIPPA HIPAA very common mistake.