4 ms·
Bootstrap 3 introduces some pretty weird markup IMO. Foundation is a bit better, but I'm going to suggest something unpopular, which is to use a lighter-weight
by 5vforest 13y ago
Bootstrap 3 introduces some pretty weird markup IMO. Foundation is a bit better, but I'm going to suggest something unpopular, which is to use a lighter-weight framework like http://purecss.io/ http://purecss.io/ or http://cardinalcss.com/ http://cardinalcss.com/ instead.
- mikeroher 13y agoPureCSS really needs to improve its markup. I tried using it but soon found my CSS littered with 'pure-' everywhere. And the grid is really "unsemantic" (?). It might just be my personal opinion, but I really disliked it.
- pspeter3 13y agoCardinal seems pretty awesome. Thanks for sharing!
- berto99 13y agocardinal looks exactly like inuit.css
- jrhorn424 13y agoHave you looked into https://github.com/dhg/Skeleton https://github.com/dhg/Skeleton? It's very lightweight. If you want something heavier, but semantic, I like http://gumbyframework.com/ http://gumbyframework.com/. I think it was based on 960gs. It also looks pleasant.