> If the problem is warding off a depression, then the solution I described is indeed a true solution. If the problem is warding off an invocation of oomkiller

> If the problem is warding off a depression, then the solution I described is indeed a true solution. If the problem is warding off an invocation of oomkiller at the kernel level, then just setting the jvm heap size lower is indeed a true solution. We'll just ignore the fact that it doesn't actually address the problem and the memory leak still exists and has actual consequences, because we stopped oomkiller from randomly killing innocent processes which is definitely a noble goal. Keynesian solutions have consequences, they are not magic. And they are not really solutions at all if you're not deceived by the simple sophistry of them, they're band-aids. That > The long term trend is unaffected. Is terribly amusing, I guess that's why we don't have financial crisis anymore or hyperinflation or sovereign debt defaults or poorly managed national economies or anything of the kind. > If sufficiently large your Bitcoin utopia will suffer these problems and you won't have a solution. That's because setting a shitty raft on fire so you're forced to deploy life vests instead of drowning is simply not a solution, and pretending otherwise is just stupidity masquerading as tactics. Whatever, as long as it works for you hope you're happy with it, I'm not buying.