4 ms·
Most of Java is open-source now. I wonder why the dependence on Oracle is so high. If Apache or a similar foundation would fork(+) and adopt it, it will benefit
by hrjet 13y ago
Most of Java is open-source now. I wonder why the dependence on Oracle is so high. If Apache or a similar foundation would fork(+) and adopt it, it will benefit the Java eco-system tremendously.
+ Fork if legally required.
- Sanddancer 13y agoApache did try to fork it with Harmony ( http://harmony.apache.org/ http://harmony.apache.org/ ), but Sun pulled every trick in the book to keep people from contributing and/or adopting it. Then again, the code is still extant, could be time to pull it out of the attic.
- hrjet 13y agoIndeed, but the situation has changed now. Sun, just before it got acquired by Oracle, had open sourced the last remaining puzzle: the Java compatibility test suite. Which allows anyone to run the test suite, claim and validate that their software is conformant with Java.
- Sanddancer 13y agoNot quite. You have to have your code "substantially based" upon OpenJDK, and be GPLed, in order to use their validation suite. So Harmony still would not be able to use their validation suite.
- Tobu 13y agoMozilla working on the web platform has more impact. The sites that still rely on a Java plugin were expecting binary compatibility and a big vendor's security support because that sounds cheapest long term, now that it doesn't happen, heads in the sand or a web port are a lot more likely than forking Java.