We don't have to listen to their editorializing to address the claims of the source. Just make a simple market-based thought experiment. Fishing vessels will co

We don't have to listen to their editorializing to address the claims of the source. Just make a simple market-based thought experiment. Fishing vessels will continue to expand their abilities to catch fish because it results in higher revenue. More ships, larger catches, extracting from a finite resource. It's nice to think of the ocean as infinitely bountiful, but it's definitely limited. So are you refuting their claim that ocean stocks are in decline and that the tsunami caused a serious pollution problem?