4 ms·

We saw one whale, sort of rolling helplessly on the surface with what looked like a big tumour on its head. Pure fear mongering crap.

• hingisundhorsa 13y ago
  Uhm, perhaps my English is slipping but that just seems like a description of what they saw.
  • panacea 13y ago
    It does have a whiff of sensationalism, but perhaps that's the old cognitive dissonance in action, because thia article is scary.
  • draugadrotten 13y ago
    The way it is written implies there is a connection between the trash they saw and the whale's tumour. I believe this is what the "fear mongering" is referring to, as there is no evidence to support that link. The environment may be damaged but the state of journalism is so poor that sometimes it's hard to tell if the story is based in fact or just a boat load of feelings. The whale is dying! [All whales will die.] Won't somebody please think of the children?
• Shinkei 13y ago
  We don't have to listen to their editorializing to address the claims of the source. Just make a simple market-based thought experiment. Fishing vessels will continue to expand their abilities to catch fish because it results in higher revenue. More ships, larger catches, extracting from a finite resource. It's nice to think of the ocean as infinitely bountiful, but it's definitely limited. So are you refuting their claim that ocean stocks are in decline and that the tsunami caused a serious pollution problem?