3 ms·
The big difference in how the cache is managed. SDWebImage has worked well when I've used it, but it's cache management is much more simplistic. I'd be curious
by michaelmior 13y ago
The big difference in how the cache is managed. SDWebImage has worked well when I've used it, but it's cache management is much more simplistic. I'd be curious to try FastImageCache on projects I've worked on to see if there's any improvement. Scrolling performance can be a tough thing to optimize for.