2 ms·
if all other things are equal, i would prefer to pay by whichever method is cheaper. if i intend to download a lot, some sort of unlimited subscription plan.
by noodle 17y ago
if all other things are equal, i would prefer to pay by whichever method is cheaper. if i intend to download a lot, some sort of unlimited subscription plan. if not, pay per song.
- williamphipps 17y agoand that makes total sense. for example, i download a lot (some months), so i would be happy to pay my ISP an extra $20 a month to download as much music as I want. but you can't ignore all the people that use itunes and are satisfied with it and might feel they are paying some kind of 'tax' if a music/isp bundled service is pushed onto them.
- noodle 17y agoperhaps an option for both? have a fixed song price menu, but also offer an all-you-can-eat option for $X/mo. i don't like the ISP option because it locks you in. no choice = not customer friendly.