4 ms·
School of Haskell is actually a website where people can create their own tutorials, so most likely the author added it themselves. (EDIT: I just checked, they
by aninhumer 13y ago
School of Haskell is actually a website where people can create their own tutorials, so most likely the author added it themselves. (EDIT: I just checked, they were created by user Yann Esposito, which most likely belongs to the author.)
Furthermore, while FPComplete are commercial, I don't believe they're monetising SoH in any way, other than its being good marketing for the company and Haskell in general.
- doorhammer 13y agoI thought it might be something along those lines. Just didn't have much time to look around. I would say, though, that it should be (and really is) up to the author where their work can or can't be displayed. I think it would be good for the community either way, but if an author doesn't want their work in any way tied to a commercial interest, then it's their right to apply licensing in such a way to ensure that, and for others to respect that (though I'm not saying you're implying otherwise; just clarifying). The monetization here would be brand exposure and site traffic to the domain/website, using the works of others (which I'm not inherently against).