3 ms·
I read oelmekki's comment as putting the number of monitored calls in context, not questioning its correctness.
by andyjohnson0 13y ago
I read oelmekki's comment as putting the number of monitored calls in context, not questioning its correctness.
- eis 13y agoYea, I think one can read it either way. What I was trying to point out, is that the number makes it clear what the surveillance is about (and that's nothing related to terrorists).
- oelmekki 13y agoIndeed, it was purely factual. Of course, I'm not implying every french was spied on - it won't make sense since a good part are just kids. But when your records count for a country exceed their population, you can't be expected to only watch a few bad guys, that's a sign of massive surveillance - or strategic surveillance over tactical surveillance, as Assange would put it.