4 ms·
Um, not really. There's a working group that is gathering data, exploring options, and intends to present a plan early next year. Right now what we have is ver
by enneff 13y ago
Um, not really. There's a working group that is gathering data, exploring options, and intends to present a plan early next year.
Right now what we have is very minimal. The current tools let you manage versions your own way. If we built something more complex we would be stuck with it forever. We're being conservative because getting it wrong would be worse than not providing it at all.
- pjmlp 13y agoFrom the ongoing discussions I inferred that whatever comes out of that work, it won't be accepted by the community at large.
- enneff 13y agoI have no idea where you get that impression from. Most people who hear about that work say something like "Oh great! I'm glad people are thinking about this, and look forward to seeing what comes of it."
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 13y agoThis is the latest thread I have been following, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/2Xluuq6hmc4 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/2Xluuq6h... It is quite easy to see how welcoming some in the community are to those ideas.
- enneff 13y agoThere are a couple of vocal people there with strong opinions. They don't represent the community as a whole. Only people with strong contrary opinions would have anything to say in such a thread, so there's a selection bias at work here.