3 ms·
They were, confusingly, referring to 'No[v]. 17'. The prior sentence refers to a new day coming, which is 'No[v]. 18'. I have no idea why they didn't go with th
by NamTaf 13y ago
They were, confusingly, referring to 'No[v]. 17'. The prior sentence refers to a new day coming, which is 'No[v]. 18'. I have no idea why they didn't go with the accepted abbreviation of November as 'Nov'. They weren't referring to building number 17.
Just clarifying, not disagreeing with your statement :)
- e28eta 13y agoIt means the #17, as in the 17th painting by Banksy, as the article says early on.
- NamTaf 13y agoAha, my bad. Thanks for the correction. It makes more sense now that I think about it; I'm almost a month early for it to be Nov. 17th.
- fotbr 13y ago>I have no idea why they didn't go with the accepted abbreviation of November as 'Nov'. Perhaps because they're talking about October?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]