4 ms·
I wholeheartedly agree with this article. I've had great success with Go's reliability. Another important point to make is that when programs written in Go do
by benbjohnson 13y ago
I wholeheartedly agree with this article. I've had great success with Go's reliability.
Another important point to make is that when programs written in Go do fail, it tends to be trivial to figure out why. There's no type hierarchy like most OOP languages and no method_missing magic like Ruby. I can typically just trace the logic backwards from the error to the cause. Most bug reports I receive for my open source Go projects get fixed in minutes.
- khyryk 13y agoI suspect it's Ruby (dynamic typing, syntactic flexibility, etc.) rather than OOP itself that's the root of the issue when it comes to tracing logic backwards.