3 ms·

All of them? I don't think there's a way around that, including expecting the people writing your copy to operate in the abstract realm of responsive CSS or wh

• aaronem 13y ago
  I'm not sure I agree on your last point; some of the younger, less print-bound designers I've worked with have a good understanding of the difference between presentation and semantics, and have been often enough annoyed by sites which look just dandy at 1920x1080, but are unusable on a phone, to have a burning desire not to produce more of the same. Stipulating that point, though, perhaps the solution is to keep designers at a higher level of granularity -- to have them produce designs for "large screen", "small screen", "mobile", "print", &c., including general ideas of how body text shall appear, but leave the more granular detail to someone who's not so much wedded to pixel-perfection, but instead understands that the same content will necessarily look different when differently rendered, and who can understand and accommodate those differences to produce a result that works well across all of them.
• qznc 13y ago
  Then there is also retina vs non-retina displays, the next site redesign, glossy vs matte screens, and non-color calibrated displays. Then there are different browsers, operating systems, and fonts installed. It is almost as funny as the request that a logo must use the "Pantone 1337" color. It probably is not representable in RGB and nobody has a color-calibrated screen.