5 ms·
Why is chrissmeuk's reply to you [dead], I wonder?
by endgame 13y ago
Why is chrissmeuk's reply to you [dead], I wonder?
- agumonkey 13y agoI don't know HN enough to guess, I was surprised too since it's dead but not removed so it asks for replies but (at least) I can't do that. I upvoted it in case it just needed to be in the positive, with no visible effect. Maybe he trolled on another thread and was punished ... anyway @chrissmeuk I understand pentium 100 are nice little cpus, I used a p2 350 for a loooong time, and I miss it a great deal since it was a real workhorse. And to clarify my first comment, I wish more people were programming on old machines, it's a good thing to avoid bloat.
- andrewflnr 13y agochrissmeuk has a pretty innocuous (and short) comment history (https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=chrissmeuk https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=chrissmeuk). The only visible clue is that someone accused them of being a Microsoft shill, and maybe someone pulled out the hellban hammer in response. There's clearly something fishy going on, on one side or another.
- endgame 13y agoI've been browsing with showdead on for a while now and more and more I see quite reasonable-looking posts that have become [dead]. My hypothesis is a little more charitable: people just get caught by some semi-automatic filter and get accidentally hellbanned. Which is still a problem. Then I post and hardly ever get responses or upvotes, which makes me wonder if: a) I'm hellbanned myself b) I'm a victim of my timezone c) My writing is not as useful as I think
- agumonkey 13y agoa) you're alive in my world (or maybe we're both hellbanned and it's hidden from us) b,c) combination of both. Internet is chaotic, I submitted nice links that had <10 votes and no comments, while a trivial one about a cute css button got 500+ ...