3 ms·
A DCMA Takedown notice is the best legal way to take down the website. If you want to get shady too you could also use tactics like using automated black hat to
by dragonbonheur 13y ago
A DCMA Takedown notice is the best legal way to take down the website. If you want to get shady too you could also use tactics like using automated black hat tools and generate lots of suspicious (to google)backlinks pointing to www.bestnewjerseyartsschool.com Far from helping them, it will tell google that they aren't worth ranking that high. Of course, it's a last resort. Copying content and duplicating it all over the web is a form of SEO attack. Now you just have to fight back.
Of course, it would still be worth it to get your own content rewritten at least once before you hit them back.
I know people won't agree with this radical solution but for those black hat guys the web is a war zone. Good luck.
- dangoldin 13y agoThanks. I'm helping my mom file it. Turns out that they actually filed a DMCA request against my mom's site for the photos she took. That's some chutzpah.
- 300bps 13y agoDo you have a copy of the DMCA request from chillingeffects.org? I think pretty much every DMCA request that Google receives has a copy sent there for public view. It should at least have their name or company name though they may have faked it.
- walshemj 13y agoI thought there where penalties for malicious use of the DMCA
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- thekevan 13y ago"If you want to get shady too you could also use tactics like using automated black hat tools and generate lots of suspicious (to google)backlinks pointing to www.bestnewjerseyartsschool.com Far from helping them, it will tell google that they aren't worth ranking that high." I'd do some research before embarking on this. Remember, they copied your mom's website, they have duplicate content. I wouldn't be surprised if Google's crawler already knows that. So if you make their site look shady, your mom's site may be hurt in SEO rankings for being guilty by association. Ironic, I know. Again, I am not sure if this could be the case, but you may want to get an expert's opinion.
- dragonbonheur 13y agoThat is precisely why I wrote it would be worthwhile to have existing content rewritten before striking back. Just in case.
- a5seo 13y agoFiling a false DMCA takedown opens the filer up to civil damages (assuming you want to pursue them). It's a shame there's no criminal penalty. http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/internet-law/consequences-of-filing-a-false-dmca-takedown-request/ http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/internet-law/consequences-of-fi...
- dangoldin 13y agoI'm actually confirming it was a DMCA request. I might have jumped to that conclusion and it may have been something else just trying to extort money from her. I'll update once I find out.
- dangoldin 13y agoSo I was wrong when I said it was a DMCA request. It was actually Getty images telling her she was using an image without licensing it. When she asked which image they sent her a link to the rip-off site since they assumed it's her. Now she just needs to tell them it's not her site and she'd be glad to have them issue a DMCA request.
- a5seo 13y agoIf Google doesn't remove the site from the SERPs, you can also serve the spammer's hosting company/ISP with a DMCA, then they'll be forced to take the site offline.
- spokenn 13y agoYeah but they'll just neg-seo you back, better. Your domain will then be trashed.
- chmars 13y agoA DCMA takedown notice might work, however, in my experience, a successful notice has often the result that the website in question is moved to another jurisdiction. Good luck with sending a DMCA takedown notice to a site hosted on a server in Bulgaria by a hosting company in Panama and a domain registrar in Thailand. .com are in theory under American jurisdiction but domain registrars cannot be made responsible for content under 'their' domain names …