5 ms·

Afghanistan Silk Road jewel reveals more of its treasures

58 points by sarreph 13y ago

lampington 13y ago
Not about the busted tor service like I thought it would be but interesting nonetheless.
- FBT 13y ago
  Indeed. A very(unintentionally) misleading title. Perhaps unfortunately, the policy here is to keep the original title of an article... That policy has many upsides, but one of its biggest downsides is that there is no discretion allowed in fixing possibly confusing titles like this one.
  - lucastx 13y ago
    I think a notice -- like "Silk Road (the real asian route) jewel reveals more of its treasures" -- would suffice here. pg said recently that the reason they revert titles is to avoid false information: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6572466 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6572466 A tiny change like this does not seem to include false information -- on the contrary, it unambiguously and imparcially clarifies it.
    - lemonberry 13y ago
      I agree with pg, but I'd add the option to place a subtitle or heading by the poster.
      - easy_rider 13y ago
        This has been provided as a nice solution multiple times. I thought the consensus was that this would be a good idea. It also ensures the post is not seen as sensation headline trolling and gets downvoted or something. The last discussion in this regard also happened after the submission of a "Silk Road Asia" article with a beautiful site from CNN or BBC (?) I'm searching but can't find it yet.
    - deleted 13y ago
      [deleted]
gettheyayo 13y ago
thought it was about the currently busted Silk Road not the real one.
clamprecht 13y ago
Is this a hack/protest on HN's title changing policy? If so, it's a clever one.
- sarreph 13y ago
  I was fooled myself, and so thought it would be a fun experiment for you guys/ladies to partake in. However, it does seem that someone has now changed the title to avoid confusion (would have thought it would happen much earlier).
  - clamprecht 13y ago
    FWIW the title was changed after my comment above. There's yet another silk road, in the recruiting space, http://www.silkroad.com/ http://www.silkroad.com/
    - sarreph 13y ago
      Sorry, didn't intend to suggest otherwise. I bet these guys are loving the extra attention.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
maaku 13y ago
I for one am thankful that I can once again click on a "Silk Road" news item and learn some more fascinating history!

58 points by sarreph 13y ago

lampington 13y ago

Not about the busted tor service like I thought it would be but interesting nonetheless.

FBT 13y ago
Indeed. A very(unintentionally) misleading title. Perhaps unfortunately, the policy here is to keep the original title of an article... That policy has many upsides, but one of its biggest downsides is that there is no discretion allowed in fixing possibly confusing titles like this one.
- lucastx 13y ago
  I think a notice -- like "Silk Road (the real asian route) jewel reveals more of its treasures" -- would suffice here. pg said recently that the reason they revert titles is to avoid false information: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6572466 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6572466 A tiny change like this does not seem to include false information -- on the contrary, it unambiguously and imparcially clarifies it.
  - lemonberry 13y ago
    I agree with pg, but I'd add the option to place a subtitle or heading by the poster.
    - easy_rider 13y ago
      This has been provided as a nice solution multiple times. I thought the consensus was that this would be a good idea. It also ensures the post is not seen as sensation headline trolling and gets downvoted or something. The last discussion in this regard also happened after the submission of a "Silk Road Asia" article with a beautiful site from CNN or BBC (?) I'm searching but can't find it yet.
  - deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]

gettheyayo 13y ago

thought it was about the currently busted Silk Road not the real one.

clamprecht 13y ago

Is this a hack/protest on HN's title changing policy? If so, it's a clever one.

sarreph 13y ago
I was fooled myself, and so thought it would be a fun experiment for you guys/ladies to partake in. However, it does seem that someone has now changed the title to avoid confusion (would have thought it would happen much earlier).
- clamprecht 13y ago
  FWIW the title was changed after my comment above. There's yet another silk road, in the recruiting space, http://www.silkroad.com/ http://www.silkroad.com/
  - sarreph 13y ago
    Sorry, didn't intend to suggest otherwise. I bet these guys are loving the extra attention.

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]

maaku 13y ago

I for one am thankful that I can once again click on a "Silk Road" news item and learn some more fascinating history!