4 ms·
Because it's a very strange and harsh instrument to put a hard limit on the amount of debt. Why is taking on $X of debt okay, but $X+1 is illegal? In every oth
by a-priori 13y ago
Because it's a very strange and harsh instrument to put a hard limit on the amount of debt. Why is taking on $X of debt okay, but $X+1 is illegal?
In every other country, public debt is kept in control the same way everything else is: by the opposition parties raising hell when it gets out of control. For this to work, of course, you need to have more than two viable parties.
- dllthomas 13y agoFor more than two viable parties, you need something other than winner-take-all first-past-the-post.