4 ms·
The number that got my attention was 20,000. That really seems extreme. What about the 40-liner Oh My Gems![1] And I wonder about the performance implications o
by reedlaw 13y ago
The number that got my attention was 20,000. That really seems extreme. What about the 40-liner Oh My Gems![1] And I wonder about the performance implications of porting all that shell script to ruby. Even running a single ruby command with a large set of gems increases loading time dramatically.[2]
1. http://blog.zenspider.com/blog/2012/09/ohmygems.html http://blog.zenspider.com/blog/2012/09/ohmygems.html
2. https://twitter.com/garybernhardt/status/388758868559290368 https://twitter.com/garybernhardt/status/388758868559290368