4 ms·
I have very little idea what this article is trying to say. I can't even decipher whether it is pro-Oculus or against it.
by Schwolop 13y ago
I have very little idea what this article is trying to say. I can't even decipher whether it is pro-Oculus or against it.
- DanBC 13y agoIt's a weird article. "Oculus is good, but CastAR is much better"? I don't see them as direct competitors. People developing for one provide some benefits to people working on the other.
- aniijbod 13y agoBut now CastAR's newly announced VR mode does indeed make them direct competitors.
- okey 13y agoIt contains so much speculation I'm not sure that what the author was trying to say even matters.
- aniijbod 13y agoWould you say the same if the article turned out to act as a spur for each of the two parties concerned to respond to its claims: if they do, and they do so candidly, you might find that at least some of the speculation that I made was correct.
- aniijbod 13y ago"I can't even decipher whether it is pro-Oculus or against it" Should an author always be expected to take sides?
- Schwolop 13y agoWhen the article's title is "Alas poor Oculus, I knew you well", insinuating that like Yorrick, Oculus is dead, then yes, the author is taking a side. The title led me one way, then the rambling prose lost all semblance of clarity and argument.
- aniijbod 13y agoWell, showing concern (by saying 'alas') that someone, or some thing had suffered Yorrick's fate, does not, as a phrase, or even in a headline, necessarily indicate that one has 'taken sides' in terms of whether that that fate was desirable. The article 'didn't clearly take sides' but instead speculated as to why the outcome of this challenge to the Rift could be both dramatic and unpredictable.