3 ms·
My guess: What screwed China was the Roman alphabet because China didn't use it. Then when the written word became important for the masses in the West and fo
by graycat 13y ago
My guess: What screwed China was the
Roman alphabet because China didn't
use it. Then when the written word
became important for the masses
in the West and for progress in the West, China
started falling behind.
The effect is still easy to see in
Chinese culture, say, cooking: It's
still strongly the case that Chinese
cooking is essentially just not written
down and, instead, is learned by
apprenticeship. E.g., I have stacks
of books on cooking -- US, French,
Italian, German, and Chinese -- and
far and away the worst written are
the books on Chinese cooking. So,
the books on American cooking I
got from my family from, say, the
1930s, are very nicely done with
times, temperatures, weights, and
volumes, but the books on Chinese
cooking have essentially no
measurements at all. Then for
explanations of the steps and details,
again the Chinese books are far behind.
Again, simply, Chinese cooking is
so far nearly never actually written
down in anything like what is common
for thorough descriptions in
countries that use the Roman
alphabet.
Why the Roman alphabet? Because
it's so darned easy to work with,
and the Chinese little drawings
severely throttle what that masses
might do with reading and writing.
- AsymetricCom 13y agoCertainly a good theory that I've also considered myself. It's a fundamental cost that every person goes through. You can contribute to the social sphere until 20+ years of literature education.
- mtts 13y agoNot a bad guess. The literacy rate at the end of the Chinese civil war (1949) was only about 11% or so. That can't possibly have been good.