"the court must be the one who bears the cost of implementing a properly auditable and secured system, not the business who has no need for it. " The court is

"the court must be the one who bears the cost of implementing a properly auditable and secured system, not the business who has no need for it. " The court is essentially an arbiter. It is on no one's side, and actually has no real skin in the game. This means it is not going to pay for this, it is going to decide which party pays for it :) If the parties fail to pay, or fail to comply, they will be possibly sent to jail Note that Levison has not really won yet, since he still has a contempt hearing coming up ...