5 ms·

Okay, seriously, what could someone possibly send over snapchat that is important to national security?

clay 13y ago
The article mentions law enforcement. I reckon these warrants are all for sex crimes.
codezero 13y ago
Registered sex offenders sending pictures of their dicks to teenagers who are foolish enough in their youth to share their Snapchat name publicly in hopes of making a social connection. Not national security, but an arguably reasonable law enforcement target.
- haakon 13y ago
  Or teen sexting, you know. Child pornography production is a serious offence.
  - peterjancelis 13y ago
    Two 15 year olds sexting is mutual pornography production in the US?
    - vidarh 13y ago
      Not just in the US. If it includes pictures, it'd potentially be so most places depending on how explicit the pictures are.
    - jbigelow76 13y ago
      Depending on how puritanical the District Attorney and/or the Judge are, yes (how safe their office is come election time figures into it too - "Vote for me, I'm tough on crime!"). It's not rare to read about some teen that is having to register as a sex offender for doing the kind of things teens have been doing for a long time, it's just that now technology keeps the evidence around and accessible.
    - usea 13y ago
      Doesn't even have to be two people. A 15 year old taking nude self photos will be in possession of child pornography.[1] [1] http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_12006602 http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_12006602
    - dspillett 13y ago
      Not production. Having pictures of yourself is fine in most western jurisdictions (US, UK, rest of Europe) though it is more problematic (or just plain stoning-is-too-good-for-you illegal) some paces elsewhere. As soon as the image is sent though, most legislatures consider that pornographic distribution. Here in the UK for instance you could at least be prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act. Having such a picture of someone else is also against the letter of the relevant laws even if the subject of the image sent it to you. Like laws covering the age of consent for explicit sexual activity (which varies between 14 and 21 depending on where you are and sometimes depending on your gender and orientation) it gets more complicated if an image crosses state borders (sender and recipient being in different states/countries). Generally speaking you would find yourself judged against the strictest of the laws involved, not the most lenient, where there is variation.

clay 13y ago

The article mentions law enforcement. I reckon these warrants are all for sex crimes.

Registered sex offenders sending pictures of their dicks to teenagers who are foolish enough in their youth to share their Snapchat name publicly in hopes of making a social connection. Not national security, but an arguably reasonable law enforcement target.

haakon 13y ago
Or teen sexting, you know. Child pornography production is a serious offence.
- peterjancelis 13y ago
  Two 15 year olds sexting is mutual pornography production in the US?
  - vidarh 13y ago
    Not just in the US. If it includes pictures, it'd potentially be so most places depending on how explicit the pictures are.
  - jbigelow76 13y ago
    Depending on how puritanical the District Attorney and/or the Judge are, yes (how safe their office is come election time figures into it too - "Vote for me, I'm tough on crime!"). It's not rare to read about some teen that is having to register as a sex offender for doing the kind of things teens have been doing for a long time, it's just that now technology keeps the evidence around and accessible.
  - usea 13y ago
    Doesn't even have to be two people. A 15 year old taking nude self photos will be in possession of child pornography.[1] [1] http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_12006602 http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_12006602
  - dspillett 13y ago
    Not production. Having pictures of yourself is fine in most western jurisdictions (US, UK, rest of Europe) though it is more problematic (or just plain stoning-is-too-good-for-you illegal) some paces elsewhere. As soon as the image is sent though, most legislatures consider that pornographic distribution. Here in the UK for instance you could at least be prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act. Having such a picture of someone else is also against the letter of the relevant laws even if the subject of the image sent it to you. Like laws covering the age of consent for explicit sexual activity (which varies between 14 and 21 depending on where you are and sometimes depending on your gender and orientation) it gets more complicated if an image crosses state borders (sender and recipient being in different states/countries). Generally speaking you would find yourself judged against the strictest of the laws involved, not the most lenient, where there is variation.