3 ms·
So um how do we know that none of the people conducting this audit are secretly working for NSA? Somewhat james bond-y idea but you get the point.
by dmishe 13y ago
So um how do we know that none of the people conducting this audit are secretly working for NSA?
Somewhat james bond-y idea but you get the point.
- dublinben 13y agoIn theory, it shouldn't matter. A public audit is public, so the work can be scrutinized by anyone.
- tptacek 13y agoThis is the new Slashdot "First Post", isn't it?
- dmishe 13y agoWhat?
- tptacek 13y agoKids these days.
- officialjunk 13y agoHmm?
- YuriNiyazov 13y agoMy god, we are old, Thomas. This is what most graybeards must feel like.
- simias 13y agoIt's more like the new "imagine a beowulf cluster of these" meme, a comment generic enough that can fit most stories while contributing nothing to the discussion. They could have settled for "I, for one, welcome our new NSA overlords".
- krapp 13y agoHow do we know you're not working for the NSA to undermine the credibility of the audit?
- balabaster 13y agoHow do we know you're not working for the NSA to undermine the undermining of the credibility of the audit? :P
- dmishe 13y agoThat's exactly the point
- wahsd 13y agoHate to break it to you and others; but there is a high degree of likelihood that it is actually even an NSA funded operation, not to mention having assets that add backdoors. How do you prevent and deflect efforts to develop a truely secure solution? ...You provide a solution that works and looks shiny and nice and defuses any kind of efforts. It's jiujitsu.