Does this mean you guys found that a large portion of the encrypted file had to be retransmitted as compared with the number of bits actually changed? How does

Does this mean you guys found that a large portion of the encrypted file had to be retransmitted as compared with the number of bits actually changed? How does one consistently store encrypted data using rsync.net as a backend, whilst maintaining the benefits of the rsync protocol? This seems to rule out the benefits of using rsync w/ encrypted files. Is there something I'm missing?